Skip to content
-

Barabanki (Uttar Pradesh)

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS)

This factsheet presents an analysis of the performance of the ‘Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme’ (MGNREGS) for the district of Barabanki (Uttar Pradesh).

Barabanki lies in the central plains and occupies a central place in the Middle Ganga Plain. It consists of 15 blocks. Read more about Barabanki.

MGNREGS aims to provide minimum 100 days of wage employment per rural household in a financial year. It was launched in 2005 with the goal of enhancing livelihood security of India’s rural masses. Read more about MGNREGS.

01.

How Much Funds Were Made Available and How Much Were Spent?

Section titled How Much Funds Were Made Available and How Much Were Spent?

Funds are made available for districts based on employment demand and the need for material. Figure 1 presents the trend of fund availability and expenditure in the district.

Figure 1: Fund Available and Expenditure (Rs Crore)

  • Between 2017-18 and 2021-22, funds available increased by Rs 135 crore, while expenditure increased by Rs 136 crore.
  • The sudden increase in expenditure in 2020-21, when it almost doubled compared to the preceding year, indicates high level of work demand because of the pandemic-induced lockdown and the subsequent economic slowdown.
  • In 2021-22, expenditure fell 16% over 2020-21, but it was still 67% higher than the pre-pandemic level in 2019-20. This perhaps indicates that the overall employment situation in places other than MGNREGS might have improved slightly compared to 2020-21, but it is still much below pre-pandemic levels.

Figure 2 shows the total funds available and total expenditure at the block level for the period from 2017-18 to 2021-22.

Figure 2: Cumulative Fund Available and Expenditure Between 2017-18 and 2021-22 (Rs Crore)

  • In this period, blocks with the highest expenditure are Nindura, Suratganj and Siddhaur.
  • Blocks with the lowest expenditure are Banki, Harakh and Masauli.
  • Out of the 15 blocks, only four (Nindura, Siddhaur, Fatehpur and Masauli) had more funds available than expenditure incurred. In the remaining 11 blocks, expenditure exceeded fund availability in varying degrees.

02.

How Has the Fund Utilisation Been?

Section titled How Has the Fund Utilisation Been?

Of the total funds available with a district, some amount can remain unspent at the end of a financial year for various reasons. The extent of funds spent out of the total funds available is called the ‘rate of utilisation’.  
Figure 3 shows out of the total MGNREGS funds available with Barabanki, how much was unspent at the end of the financial year and its annual rate of utilisation.

Figure 3: Unspent Balance and Rate of Utilisation

  • After peaking in 2018-19, unspent balance has been coming down.
  • In 2021-22, there was a shortage of funds—expenditure exceeded fund availability.
  • Rate of utilisation, which is the amount spent as a percentage of available funds, has seen a continuous improvement.

Figure 4: Unspent Balance/ Fund Shortage in Blocks (Rs lakh)

  • At the aggregate block level, there has been a fund shortage in 2017-18, 2020-21 and 2021-22.
  • In 2017-18 and 2020-21, while there was a shortage of funds at the block level, there were unspent funds at the district level. This is because funds were lying with the ‘district level line department’ and the ‘district programme coordinator (DPC)’
  • At the end of 2021-22, Dariyabad, Bani Kodar and Suratganj had the highest level of fund shortages.

03.

Where is the Money Going?

Section titled Where is the Money Going?

Total expenditure under MGNREGS occurs on four components: wages, material, taxes paid on buying materials, and lastly the administration. The last two are small components. Hence, only wages and material expenses have been analysed below. 

Figure 5: Components of Expenditure

  • From 2018-19 onwards, expenditure on wages has increased continuously.
  • During 2020-21, when there was sudden increase in demand for MGNREGS, the total increase in expenditure was equally distributed between wages and material. This is different from most districts, where a much larger portion went towards increased wage payment.
  • The other two components (taxes and administration expenses) are in the range of a combined Rs 4-9 crore in this period.

04.

What is the Scale of Payment Due?

Section titled What is the Scale of Payment Due?

Sometimes, either because of excess expenditure over funds available or because of procedural delays, payment for the work done can be due at the end of the period. This amount is called ‘payment due’. This amount is generally paid in the subsequent period. Figure 6 shows the trend of total payment due and its breakup across two major components, wages and material.

Figure 6: Total Payment Due (Rs Lakh)

  • Between 2017-18 and 2019-20, ‘payment due’ has remained at a minimal level.
  • In 2021-22, dues increased by Rs 13.3 crore over 2020-21, of which Rs 11 crore was towards material.
  • At the end of 2021-22, Suratganj, Sirauli Gauspur and Dariybad were the blocks with the highest payment due.

05.

How Many Demanded Work and How Many Were Offered?

Section titled How Many Demanded Work and How Many Were Offered?

Under the scheme, all rural households whose adult members are willing to do unskilled manual work, and demand the same, are to be given such work. In this context, there are three datapoints: how many persons demanded (applied for) work; of those who demanded, how many were offered work; of those who were offered work, how many availed the work. These indicators are presented below.

Figure 7: Trends in Employment Demanded, Offered and Availed (No. of Persons in 1,000)

  • The number of persons demanding work increased by 76% in 2020-21 compared to 2019-20, which again points to the impact of the COVID-19 induced crisis in the job market.
  • In 2021-22, demand for work declined 9%, but the number of persons availing work remained the same.
  • In all five years, almost everyone who demanded employment under the scheme was offered employment.
  • However, in all five years, the number of persons who availed employment was much lower than the number that were offered employment.
  • The average number of days a person was working in a year ranged from 34 (in 2017-18) to 41 (in 2019-20).
  • In 2021-22, when demand for work was high, the average number of days a person worked fell to 39. This is much below the 100 days guaranteed under the scheme. Further investigation is needed to identify reasons for this.
  • Of the total families that were offered employment, the proportion of families that completed 100 days of work in a financial year increased from 0.6% in 2017-18 to 18.2% in 2021-22.

Figure 8 compares the district with the state on the percentage of people who availed employment out of those who were offered employment.

Figure 8: Out of All Who Were Offered Employment, What Proportion Availed It (%)

  • Before the pandemic, this proportion was steady for both the district and the state, with the district having a slightly higher level than the state.
  • In 2020-21, the proportion fell for both the district and the state. This is on account of increased demand in 2020-21, with the number of persons demanding employment increasing more sharply than the number of persons availing employment.

06.

How Has Employment Been Distributed Across Gender?

Section titled How Has Employment Been Distributed Across Gender?

Figure 9 presents the employment data divided by gender.

Figure 9: Gender Disaggregated Data

  • Compared to 2017-18, both men and women saw a higher number of employed days in 2020-21.
  • In 2021-22, while the number of person-days declined for men, it increased for women.
  • After declining for the first four years of our study period, the share of women in work-days increased in 2021-22. This is largely because of a decline in work-days for men and an increase for women.
  • From the data available, it is not possible to infer if the increase in work-days for women is due to more women working or an increase in the average number of days that women are working. Data availability in this regard would be helpful on the scheme MIS.

07.

How Has Employment Been Distributed Across Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes?

Section titled How Has Employment Been Distributed Across Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes?

Figure 10 represent the person-days availed, in absolute and relative terms, by the three social groups: Scheduled Tribes (STs), Scheduled Castes (SCs) and others.

Figure 10: Employment for STs and SCs

  • Barabanki has a very small population of Scheduled Tribes. Hence their share in MGNREGS work is also almost negligible.
  • The two remaining groups, SCs and others, both saw an increase in work-days between 2017-18 and 2021-22.
  • The share of SCs in total person-days of work has ranged from 38.7% to 40.3%. This is higher than the 26.5% share of SCs in the district population.

08.

Where Does the District Stand on Information Available for MGNREGS?

Section titled Where Does the District Stand on Information Available for MGNREGS?

Given the importance of the scheme in generating livelihoods for a large number of people, different data points/information related to the scheme should be available and accessible by the common masses. Figure 11 compiles a list of essential data points/information regarding MGNREGS that would of interest to various stakeholders, and hence must be available and accessible for the district. 
The data points/information regarding MGNREGS is available on the MIS of the scheme: (http://mnregaweb4.nic.in/netnrega/MISreport4.aspx). The Data accessed on 20th June, 2022.

 Transparency and Accountability Index for MGNREGS in Barabanki

Availability of Information and Comprehensiveness

  • Information on funds available
    • Yes
  • Information on funds utilized
    • Yes
  • Delays in compensation and the reasons thereof'
    • Yes
  • Status of beneficiaries’ accounts (frozen or unfrozen)
    • Details on number of frozen accounts is available, but beneficiaries may not be able to check their status.
  • Information on ‘number of person-days’ of jobs generated
    • Yes
  • Gender-wise disaggregation of beneficiaries’ data
    • Yes
  • Disaggregation of beneficiaries’ data by social groups
    • Yes
  • Availability of information on work/project undertaken
    • Yes
  • Geographical granularity of the fiscal indicator
    • Houeshold

Accessibility

  • Language of availability of information
    • English only (Addition of Hindi and other regional languages may be more useful to beneficiaries)
  • Compatibility on devices
    • Phone, tablet, laptop friendly. But there’s no back button due to Captcha, which makes it a little cumbersome for users.

Timeliness

  • Frequency of data updation
    • Real-Time

Relevance

  • How relevant would users find it
    • It is largely useful and relevant for policymakers, civil society organizations (CSOs) and researchers. It can be made more relevant to beneficiaries. For instance, data on the number of projects, job-card holders, etc. is useful for researchers and CSOs; information on convergence of MGNREGS with other schemes and so on will be useful for policymakers and administrators, etc. However, beneficiaries cannot check their particular account status or delayed compensations, etc. 

Reliability

  • Whether the data is reliable
    • While Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audit reports for MGNREGS are available, authenticating with MIS as well as ground-truthing is essential. 

Accountability and Citizen’s Participation

  • Social Audit schedules
    • Social audit calendars are available.
  • Availability of social audit reports
    • Gram Panchayat social audit reports are available for some Panchayats in some years, based on selection for social audit.
  • Participation of beneficiaries in Gram Sabhas
    • Although details on action taken after social audits are available, information on the number of beneficiaries as participants is not available; just the total number of participants in the Gram Sabhas is given.
  • Availability of details on financial misappropriation and recovery
    • Yes
  • Availability of information on Grievance Redressal Mechanism for beneficiaries

CREDITS

Author: Suraj Jaiswal

Series Edited by: Nilachala Acharya, Subrat Das

Editorial Inputs: Manish Kumar, Manik Tiwari

Designed by: Flying Saints

Graphics by: How India Lives

Back to Top